Verdidebatt

Våpen til befolkningen betyr en mulig, god religiøs nabo

Ved Bibelen så er man forpliktet (de 10 bud, med Bibelen bevart og kriminalitet best bekjempet) til å si "Våpen (også ikke-dødelige) til befolkningen betyr en mulig, god religiøs nabo". Det fremgår ihvertfall ytterst klart at "Hitler anvisningen"...

Dette er en kommentar. Den gir uttrykk for skribentens analyser og meninger.

"Adolf Hitler research - Causes to his rise: After much investigation into human nature, especially lying, and psychiatric issues, mSomatism too, I find that Adolf Hitler may have come to power mainly out of 2 causes:
1. The lack of personal weapons in the German population. I bet with Wild Wild West, that most U. S. Americans would have one or more personal weapons at this point, also rifles (lever action incl.). 
2. There would be the special rule in navel-gazing Germany (we're BIG, 40-50 millions, whatever) that would allow anybody who could gather a larger mass of people and claim power by this gathering, that he (man dominant, sorry women) would win Germany and become the leader of the nation.
Extra: at the same time, big Germany has its many affiliations elsewhere, also suppressed by the settlement with France that costed heavily. That they aired thoughts with the U. S. Americans, still with their weaponry and good at it too. Excited with some approval, the Germans begin to pick up on crazy ideas, still due to the lack of personal weapons in their population, allowing much insanity to happen, under under-paid police. So the Germans report back to homeland from New York, with only the crazy ideas, "because only these ideas work with us, or that, "you corrupt Germans... well, well, you can talk to them", while massive people showed up with an ever-idiot A. Hitler "because he was friend with everybody".
So with the failure to reason behind the personal weapons of many, and consequently without the power to assassinate the crazy people too, Adolf Hitler takes power and coarse political rhetoric takes hold, "the Jews are to blame", plus others, "we're the best in the World", "we are HUGE, we take over the World", or whatever.
Conclusion: not only corrupt forces like that. No, the lack of personal weapons has made the German people inclined toward the corrupt mind, and that other factors made this inclination/disposition cascade/gather force so for Germany to make many idiot-mistakes, many that lead to dubious invitations, to fx. Henry Ford and others, and set crazy-Nazi-Germany ready for WAR! Insanity evidently most clear! Agree?"

Norsk igjen: Ved " http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.no/2013/07/new-theory-for-rise-of-adolf-hitler.html " så burde det bli ytterst klart hvis man systematisk begår de feil som innebærer å utsette naboen for manglende fysisk sikkerhet. Å jobbe for naboens sikkerhet betyr å arbeide for naboen som en god venn, ved "De 10 bud": gjeldende 8, 9 og 10! Betydelig altså!

Extra under the above, in addition to consider the active use of Neuro-values (4.0 by Scientology) to qualify the leaders as not being monsters in disguise:

To cut the usual "smile of idiocy" from European thinking, that the Universality Principle of Ethics as safety-webbing is easily DESTROYED if one sits there trying to say that the Principle and Insecurity to the neighbour (with a possible disposition of acceptance by torture to the neighbour) by refusing to accept the personal weapons (max. 5?) and non-lethal weapons to ALL, denying these bloated psychiatrists these aloof statements over sanity as THEY have allowed "vampires to walk in broad daylight", like "educated torturers" and serial-killers, 10 or more!

PS: Jeg er egentlig under et betydelig for denne tekst, "men, men, hva vet man om det..."

Vårt Land anbefaler

1

1

1

1

Mer fra: Verdidebatt